Giriş

Empirical Evidence on Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law in Türkiye

Alper Yiğit Coşkun; Ivana Horvat

7th International Symposium on Law, Governance and Institutions · 2020

Özet

This study examines judicial independence and the rule of law in Türkiye. Survey responses and administrative records were analysed with panel regression methods. Key themes include justice, rule of law, judicial. Legal and institutional reform is argued to be necessary to protect human rights and combat corruption.

Künye

Yayın türü
Bildiri
Dergi / Yayınevi / Etkinlik
7th International Symposium on Law, Governance and Institutions
Yıl
2020
Dil
İngilizce
WoS araştırma alanı
Government & Law
Anahtar sözcükler
justice, rule of law, judicial
Yazar sırası (kurum yazarı)
Last
Atıf (WoS / Scopus / Toplam)
0 / 0 / 8
Kurum araştırmacısı
Doç. Dr. Alper Yiğit Coşkun
Erişim ve lisans
Açık erişim · ccCC BY
Kalıcı bağlantı
https://avys.mr1.com.tr/yayin/258

BMSKA Sınıflandırma Gerekçesi

SDG 16: Barış, Adalet ve Güçlü Kurumlar en yüksek skoru aldı (98.2 ≥ eşik 28). Eşleşen kavramlar: law, rule of law, judicial, justice, institution, corruption, human rights, legal.

SDG 16: Barış, Adalet ve Güçlü Kurumlar98.2
Eşleşen kavramlar: law, rule of law, judicial, justice, institution, corruption, human rights, legal
SDG 15: Karasal Yaşam3.0
SDG 5: Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği2.5

Model: TF-IDF (karakter n-gram) + Türkçe/İngilizce anahtar kelime sözlüğü v1 · atama eşiği 28.0 · yöntem: sorgu-seti · JSON gerekçe · tüm eşleşme kayıtları

Veri kaynağı: Kullanıcı girişi

Tam Metin

Bu yayın için tam metin yüklenmemiş.

Bu yayının aldığı atıflar (8)

  1. Advances in judicial
    Luca Ferrari, Tolga Ege Bayrak, Sofia Lindqvist · Government & Law Open · 2026
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2026.9131
  2. Recent trends in rule of law
    Jan Novák, Ahmet Kaan Yılmaz · Government & Law Open · 2025
    Google Scholar
  3. Machine learning approaches for judicial
    Luca Ferrari, Sofia Lindqvist, Elena Ionescu · Journal of Government & Law Research · 2024
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2024.1240
  4. Assessing justice
    Selin Duru Arslan, Gökçe Mine Tan · Advances in Government & Law · 2024
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2024.4338
  5. Assessing justice
    Yasemin Tuna Şahin, Selin Duru Arslan · Government & Law Open · 2022
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2022.4470
  6. Assessing justice
    Gökçe Mine Tan, Luca Ferrari, Ilgın Su Kara · Government & Law Open · 2022
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2022.5398
  7. Towards sustainable justice
    Luca Ferrari, Nikos Papadakis, Ilgın Su Kara · International Journal of Government & Law · 2021
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2021.2051
  8. Towards sustainable judicial
    Ahmet Kaan Yılmaz · International Journal of Government & Law · 2021
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2021.8908

Kaynakça: bu yayının yaptığı atıflar (7)

  1. Recent trends in judicial
    Tolga Ege Bayrak, Marko Jovanović · Advances in Government & Law · 2019
    Google Scholar
  2. Modelling judicial
    Ivana Horvat, Mustafa Eren Çakır, Ilgın Su Kara · Government & Law Letters · 2017
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2017.7864
  3. Advances in judicial
    Barış Cem Uysal, Buse Nur Aydın · Advances in Government & Law · 2014
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2014.2337
  4. Recent trends in justice
    Tolga Ege Bayrak · Advances in Government & Law · 2013
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2013.1507
  5. Recent trends in justice
    Ahmet Kaan Yılmaz, Marko Jovanović, Tolga Ege Bayrak · International Journal of Government & Law · 2011
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2011.1433
  6. Machine learning approaches for rule of law
    Oğuz Han Erdem, Marko Jovanović · Advances in Government & Law · 2008
    Google Scholar
  7. An experimental study of rule of law
    Georgi Dimitrov, Ilgın Su Kara, Oğuz Han Erdem · Government & Law Letters · 2008
    Google Scholar · DOI: 10.5555/ref.2008.3042